In the chapter that was assigned and the reading that was
provided I learned that both writers are actually quite similar. Their
technique and goal seem to be quite comparable, from my point of view. The one
thing that might separate or distinguish them is what they tend to include or
incorporate into there storytelling.  
Hemingway has a more personal point of view in his writing,
almost as if it’s conversational. He incorporates his daily life, activities,
ideas, feelings, and thoughts in his chapters. 
In “A Moveable Feast” it basically depicts his time and
encounters in Paris, while Passos provides a more distinct interpretation of
his current environment. His concerns lie more on an overall bases of his
surroundings. 
In Hemingway’s “People of the Seine” chapter he begins with
a discussion regarding locations and addresses in Paris. He mentions rue
Cardinal Lemoine and then goes on to Boulevard Saint-Germaine. 
He remarks, “this was not like any other Paris market but
was a sort of bonded warehouse where wine was stored against the payment of
taxes and was as cheerless from the outside as a military depot or a prison.”
The whole start of the chapter almost reminds me of a simple conversation
regarding location. This is why, personally, I find his reading to be easier. 
From then on he lets his mind lead him and transition from a
discussion regarding fishing and his fascination and reasons on why he does not
participate but still follows it to the sad beginning and end of seasons in
Paris. 
“This was the only truly sad time in Paris because it was
unnatural. You expected to be sad in the fall. Part of you died each year when
the leaves fell from the trees and their branches were bare against the wind
and the cold, wintry light. 
But you knew there was always spring, as you knew the river
would flow again after it was frozen. When the cold rains kept on and killed
the spring, it was as though a young person had died for no reason. “ 
This passage in the chapter shows his dedication and love
for Paris. He speaks about how although one chapter of Paris may be closing and
he is about to endure a part he may not be so fond of, he is still going to
remain and look forward to when “his” Paris will resume and return. Because
Hemingway does seem to speak with his mind, his ideals will often be projected.
So Paris is often romanticized, even if moments seem to be
criticized he seems to find a way return the short moment of truth into just a
beautiful reality. 
When Passos begins his writing, he includes all details regarding
his current writing subject. Although, it is quite close to Hemingway’s style,
it is not as romanticized it seems to find itself to be more informative.  
For example, in segments in his writing he decides to not
only include descriptions but their history. 
Passos biased view is more palpable, he sticks to very dark
or cynical terms. I recall he uses the term “gloomy” and “grey.” He doesn’t
idealize or even idolize Paris as much as his former colleague did. He even
states, “think of them guys in Paris, havin’ a hell of a time with wine an’
women, an’ we stay out her an’ clean our guns an’ drill.” 
Although, both seem to follow a parallel documentation about
their travels or time in Paris. Passos and Hemingway do have tiny features that
distinct and separate them from each other. Hemingway is more loving and
thought incorporated with his writing. He lets his mind take charge, while
Passos has a more informative and cynical point of view with his writing.